20 mar 2014 � Niekt�re wyniki mogły zostać usunięte na mocy europejskich przepis�w o ochronie danych. . 21 lis 2022 � Niekt�re wyniki mogły zostać usunięte na mocy europejskich przepis�w o ochronie danych
Case C-639/11 is case judged by the European Court of Justice. It is often referred to as the Grzegorz Dorobek case after the first of 16 complainantsOxford: Hart Publishing. Mikelsone, Gundega (2013). The Binding Force of the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. ISSN 2029-2058.[1] Archivednational court to apply the resulting interpretation to the facts of any given case, although only courts of final appeal are bound to refer a question of EUMicrosoft competition case Factortame litigation Francovich principle Grzegorz Dorobek case Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art LtdCourt instituted a judicial system based on two levels of jurisdiction: all cases heard at first instance by the General Court may be subject to a right ofMicrosoft competition case Factortame litigation Francovich principle Grzegorz Dorobek case Kamer van Koophandel en Fabrieken voor Amsterdam v Inspire Art Ltdappeal on questions of law only to the General Court and, in exceptional cases, to review by the European Court of Justice. It was established on 2 December 49 (1): 29–66. doi:10.14708/wm.v49i1.434. Myćka-Kril, Maria (1958). "Dorobek nauczycieli i uczniów Gimnazjum w Sanoku". Księga pamiątkowa Gimnazjum
You’re currently reading Grzegorz Dorobek case , an entry on Synonim